QUAKE PRO RAZOR MOUSE DRIVERS

So all I have to say that this new monitor is really good! The previous monitor was ViewSonicVX2268wm and the difference between ViewSonic and Asus 278HE is quite the same as 75hz compared to 120hz. Back in the days I started with 60hz LCD monitor, then upgraded to 75, 120 and now 144hz. It can be better than my old 120hz but 144hz / no lightboost is just at own level. I don't know what it is but somehow really hard to see anything when moving fast. And I have to say that with 120hz and lightboost 10% enabled it is not smooth at all.

Used guide, reinstalled drivers, removed 3d vision etc. I had quite much testing with lightboost and asked some setting / tweaking help from KP. M_yaw and m_pitch settings: 0.022 (default) Monitor that you are using, and what refreshrate, using lightboost? : Asus VG278HE 144hz, no lightboost Sensitivity settings (cm/360, settings in qw client, settings in windows) : sensitivity 1.68, ~10cm/360Įzquake or other client? version? : Ezquake latest

QUAKE PRO RAZOR MOUSE DRIVERS

Mouse (what mouse,hertz, using drivers or no drivers, dpi settings?):Roccat Savu, no drivers, 4000dpi, 1000hz and Logitech G13 for left hand. So if you are going to use 144hz i'd recommend using eyecandy or lego textures, not gl_max_size 1 or one-colored walls/floors) as in these modes its extremely hard to notice the artifacts. Well at 144hz any tracefree setting I can still force the monitor to produce artifacts, on dm3 I found a real easy way, just jumping around the ring area while watching the ground, and in lightboost these artifacts completely 100% disappear ,Īlthough im playing with gl_max_size 1 and this mode is very unforgiving regarding artifacts, while if i use textures, like lego quake, these artifacts are very hard to produce at 144 hz, and there are none in lightboost. With VG278HE the difference is not that big in QW even if it is highly noticeable using monitortests like those on and other similar tests (pixperan, monitortest from flatpanels.dk).Īlso, VG248QE is so much faster monitor that even with the inputlag increase of lightboost it would still be faster in terms of image processing lag as VG278HE is without. It was the same with 2233rz -> xl2410t transition: xl2410t looks a lot worse because of overdrive overshoot trailing, but feels more responsive because the input lag is lower. And while you get clearer motion, the image looks worse because you are loosing control of your brightness setting, color settings and even overdrive settings (which becomes maxed out) and this causes inverse trailing caused by the overdrive overshoot. Maybe that extra half frame has decided his fate in multiple game situations. I don't know why Renzo would prefer -3ms with a blurrier picture than +3ms with a clearer picture. Hard to explain but its like in 144hz it takes a bit extra time (milliseconds) for the picture to 'stabilize' but in lightboost its completely clear all the time, its like less brainlag in lightboost mode, even if the actual input delay is higher.Īnyway theres no right or wrong here, its all about what you feel is the best for you I guess.Įdit: you should try 1001 maxfps 1000hz mouse and lightboost at 10%, while making sure to disable everything with 3D/stereoscopic stuff from nvidia drivers, its so smooth it's insane, while when I put 616 fps, and rest same settings, there is slight tearing and slightly more sluggish mousefeeling, although in a way it helps aim almost because you have more control over you aim and movement, again hard to explain, but yeah In something like battlefield where it can be very difficult to detect enemies from the background, I can see why blurring could be a real issue.įor me, the simplest test was 144 hz no light boost, trying tracefree 40/60/80 and rocketjumping really fast around different maps, and 120 hz lightboost at 10% and doing the same, and the difference is clear as night and day for me, 144hz feels a tiny bit more responsive with the mouse, but theres huge blurring compared to the lightboost mode, where there is basically zero blur and no artifacts either, The biggest problem is that it makes input feel laggier than normally, image quality issues in a game (this means only qw) would not be so important since qw doesn't look that good even with the better textures and/or extra graphics effects.Īnd in Quake the fullbright skins are so obviously visible that I think blurring is less of a harm than laggy feeling in input. Just because moving makes everything so fucking blurry. Because honestly I think 144hz or just 120hz no lightboost feels worse than lightboosted 120hz.

You honestly think it feels worse in game? Or do you mean it feels worse outside of game.

Quake pro razor mouse